Practice Free OGEA-103 Exam Online Questions
Which of the following best describes purpose of the Business Scenarios?
- A . To identify risk when implementing an architecture project
- B . To identify and understand requirements
- C . To catch errors in a project architecture early
- D . To guide decision making throughout the enterprise
B
Explanation:
Business scenarios are a technique for capturing, clarifying, and communicating the functional and non-functional requirements of a system. Business scenarios describe the business environment, the actors involved, the desired outcomes, and the processes or rules that govern the behavior of the system. Business scenarios are useful for ensuring that the architecture addresses the real needs and concerns of the stakeholders, and for validating and testing the architecture against expected situations. Business scenarios are developed in Phase A: Architecture Vision of the ADM cycle, and refined and updated throughout the other phases3
Reference: 3: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 26:
Business Scenarios: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method
(ADM), Chapter 18: Phase A: Architecture Vision
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are employed as an Enterprise Architect consultant within a manufacturing company. The company has multiple business units located worldwide, including retail, manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, and technology.
The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice and uses the TOGAF standard for its architecture development method. The EA practice is engaged throughout all the business units, with governance provided by multiple Architecture Boards with responsibility for a business line. In addition to the EA program, the company uses a number of management frameworks, including business planning, project/portfolio management, and operations management. The EA program is sponsored by the Chief Information Officer (CIO).
After a recent study, senior management are concerned about the impact of the company’s multiple data centers and duplication of applications on the business efficiency. To address the concern, a strategic architecture has been defined; it will help improve the ability to meet customer demand and improve the efficiency of operations. The strategic architecture involves the consolidation of multiple applications programs that are currently used in different business units and putting them all onto a cloud-based solution instead.
Each business unit has completed the Architecture Definition documentation to meet its own specific operational requirements. The Enterprise Architects have analyzed the corporate changes and implementation constraints. A consolidated gap analysis has been completed. Based on its results, the architects have reviewed the requirements, dependencies and interoperability requirements needed to integrate the cloud-based solution. The architects have completed the Business Transformation Readiness Assessment. Based on all these factors they have produced a risk assessment. They have also completed the draft Implementation and Migration Plan, the draft Architecture Roadmap, and the Capability Assessment deliverables.
Due to the risks of changing from the current environment, the decision has been taken that a gradual approach is needed to implement the target architectures. It will likely take a few years to complete the whole implementation process.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked to decide on the next steps for the migration planning.
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?
- A . You update the Architecture Definition Document, which includes setting project objectives and documenting the final requirements. This will ensure that the architecture remains relevant and
responsive to the needs of the enterprise. You then produce an Implementation Governance Model to
manage the lessons learned prior to finalizing the Implementation and Migration plan. You recommend that lessons learned be quickly applied as changes to the architecture. - B . You estimate the business value for each project by applying the Business Value Assessment Technique. The assessment should focus on return on investment and performance evaluation
criteria used to monitor the progress of the architecture transformation. You confirm and plan a series
of Transition Architecture phases using an Architecture Definition Increments Table. You then document the lessons learned and generate the final Implementation and Migration Plan. - C . You need to determine how the Implementation and Migration plan fits with the other frameworks
being used in the organization. You coordinate the planning with the business planning, project/portfolio management and operations management frameworks. You assign a business value to each project, considering the available resources and how well they align with the strategy. You then update the architecture roadmap and the Implementation and Migration Plan. - D . You conduct a Compliance Assessment to ensure that the architecture is being implemented according to the contract. The Compliance Assessment verifies that the implementation team is using the proper development methodology. It should also include deployment of monitoring tools. If the monitoring tools show that performance targets are not being met, then the performance requirements should be changed and the Implementation and Migration Plan updated.
C
Explanation:
Option C aligns best with TOGAF Phase F: Migration Planning, which deals with developing a detailed Implementation and Migration Plan, ensuring alignment with other enterprise frameworks, and assigning business value to work packages and projects.
TOGAF Phase F Activities (from the standard):
Confirm Management Framework Interactions:
Per TOGAF, Phase F ensures that the migration planning is aligned with the business planning, portfolio/project management, and operations management frameworks used by the enterprise (which are mentioned in the scenario).
TOGAF emphasizes coordination between EA and other enterprise governance processes.
Prioritize Projects:
TOGAF recommends using business value, resource availability, and strategic alignment to prioritize the various work packages and projects for implementation.
This is directly referenced in option C: "assign a business value to each project, considering the available resources and how well they align with the strategy."
Update Roadmaps and Implementation Plan:
After coordination and prioritization, the Architecture Roadmap and the Implementation and Migration Plan are updated.
This is essential before formal governance (Phase G).
❌ Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:
A: Incorrect focus on updating the Architecture Definition Document and lessons learned.
The Architecture Definition Document is mostly finalized in Phases BCE.
Lessons learned and governance modeling are more relevant to Phase G (Implementation Governance) and Phase H (Architecture Change Management), not Phase F.
B: Although it mentions the Business Value Assessment Technique (a valid tool in TOGAF), it includes Architecture Definition Increments Table, which is not a standard TOGAF artifact.
Also, "document the lessons learned" is premature in Phase F; these are more applicable in Phase H.
D: Focuses on Compliance Assessment, which is part of Phase G (Implementation Governance), not Phase F.
Changing performance requirements based on monitoring tools is handled during operations and change management, not during migration planning.
Source
Reference from TOGAF:
TOGAF 9.2 C Section 11.3 (Phase F: Migration Planning)
"Activities include confirming the enterprise’s capability for transition, prioritizing projects, identifying dependencies and resource availability, and co-ordinating with other management frameworks."
TOGAF 9.2 C Section 11.4 Outputs:
Architecture Roadmap (updated)
Implementation and Migration Plan (updated)
Business Value Assessment
Consolidated Gaps, Solutions, and Dependencies
Consider the following chart:
Which important concept for Enterprise Architecture Practitioners does it illustrate?
- A . Enterprise Architects must use Gantt charts to communicate with Stakeholders.
- B . An Enterprise Architecture must be developed in phases with a limited fixed duration.
- C . ADM phases must be run in a sequenced approach to produce the Architecture.
- D . ADM phases must be run simultaneously until the relevant information has been produced.
C
Explanation:
The chart shown is a Gantt chart, which is commonly used for project management to illustrate a project schedule. In the context of TOGAF (The Open Group Architecture Framework), which is a framework for enterprise architecture, this Gantt chart is demonstrating the sequenced approach to the Architecture Development Method (ADM). The ADM is the core process of TOGAF which provides a tested and repeatable process for developing architectures. The ADM is described as being iterative, over the whole process, between phases, and within phases. For each iteration of the ADM, a fresh decision must be taken about each of the parameters (scope, granularity, time period, and architecture assets).
The ADM consists of a number of phases that have to be followed in sequence:
Preliminary Phase: Framework and principles
Phase A: Architecture Vision
Phase B: Business Architecture
Phase C: Information Systems Architectures, including Data and Application Architectures
Phase D: Technology Architecture
Phase E: Opportunities and Solutions
Phase F: Migration Planning
Phase G: Implementation Governance
Phase H: Architecture Change Management
Requirements Management
Each phase is dependent on the outputs of the previous phase and the Requirements Management phase runs throughout. The Gantt chart clearly shows the dependency and sequence in which these phases occur, implying that a structured approach is followed to produce the enterprise architecture.
The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, a standard of The Open Group
The TOGAF documentation available at https://publications.opengroup.org/standards/architecture and https://publications.opengroup.org/guides/architecture
Partitions reflect the organization’s structure
- A . 2 and 3
- B . 1 and 3
- C . 1 and 4
- D . 2 and 4
B
Explanation:
Statements 1 and 3 about architecture partitioning are correct. Architecture partitioning is the technique of dividing an architecture into smaller and more manageable parts that can be developed, maintained, and governed independently. Partitions are used to simplify the management of the Enterprise Architecture and to enable different teams to work on different elements of the architecture at the same time. Partitions are not equivalent to architecture levels, which are different degrees of abstraction or detail in an architecture. Partitions do not necessarily reflect the organization’s structure, which may change over time or differ from the architecture’s scope and boundaries.
Reference: The TOGAF® Standard | The Open Group Website, Section 2.5 Architecture Partitioning.
Scenario
You are working as an Enterprise Architect within an Enterprise Architecture (EA) team at a large government agency. The agency has multiple divisions.
The agency has a well-established EA practice and follows the TOGAF standard as its method for architecture development. Along with the EA program, the agency also uses various management frameworks, including business planning, project/portfolio management, and operations management. The EA program is sponsored by the Chief Information Officer (CIO), who has actively promoted architecting with agility within the EA department as her preferred approach for projects.
The government has mandated that the agency prepare themselves for an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-first world, which they have called their “AI-first” plan. As a result, the agency is looking to determine the impact and role that AI will play moving forward. The CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to look at how AI can be used for services across the agency. She has noted that digital platforms will be a priority for investment in order to scale the AI applications planned. Using AI to automate tasks and make things run smoother is seen as a big advantage. Process automation and improved efficiency from manual, repetitive activities have been identified as the key benefits of applying generative AI to their agency’s business. This will include back-office automation, for example, for help center agents who receive hundreds of email inquiries. This should also improve services for citizens by making them more efficient and personalized, tailored to each individual’s needs.
Many of the agency leaders are worried about relying too much on AI. Some leaders think their employees will need to learn new skills. Some employees are worried they might lose their jobs to AI. Other leaders worry about security and cyber resilience in the digital platforms needed for AI to be successful.
The leader of the Enterprise Architecture team has asked for your suggestions on how to address the concerns, and how to manage the risks of a new architecture for the AI-first project.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?
- A . You recommend creating an Organization Map to display the links between different parts of the agency. This will help the EA team to find and involve all areas of the agency impacted by this strategic change. Multiple business models should then be created that can be applied to AI-related projects. A meeting will be held with the stakeholders to teach them how to interpret the models and see how their concerns are being addressed. Risk will be managed as part of the Security Architecture development.
- B . You recommend that the key stakeholders be formally identified. This should include those who will be most helpful for the change to be successful. A Communication Plan should be made to address their needs. This plan should include a report that summarizes the key features of the architecture based on stakeholder requirements and addressing concerns. You communicate with each key stakeholder to make sure their concerns are being addressed. You make sure that the architecture being developed clearly addresses risk management.
- C . You recommend conducting an analysis of the stakeholders. This involves documenting the positions, concerns, issues, and cultural factors of each group. This information will shape how the architecture is to be presented and communicated. The concerns and relevant views can then be defined for each group and recorded in the Architecture Vision document. The requirements for addressing risk should be recorded in the Architecture Requirements Specification and checked through regular assessments and feedback.
- D . You recommend conducting an analysis that separates the different types of stakeholders into groups. They can be divided into categories: corporate functions, end-user organization, project team, external vendors, and external partners. A model will be developed for each stakeholder category to ensure that all the necessary information and actions are taken into account. Meetings will be arranged with stakeholders to verify that their concerns have been adequately addressed. Risk management will be included in this process.
C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation
Context of the Scenario
The agency is initiating a strategic “AI-first” plan to transform processes using AI and improve efficiency while ensuring service improvements for citizens.
Several stakeholder concerns have been raised, such as:
Job security for employees.
Skill development for adapting to new technologies.
Cybersecurity and resilience risks due to reliance on digital platforms.
TOGAF emphasizes the importance of stakeholder management, communication, and risk management to ensure successful adoption and implementation of new architecture. These
concerns need to be addressed methodically by gathering requirements, analyzing stakeholder positions, and ensuring proper communication of risks and benefits.
Option Analysis
Option A:
Strengths:
Proposes creating an Organization Map to identify the links between different parts of the agency and the impact of the strategic change.
Suggests holding stakeholder meetings to address concerns.
Includes managing risks as part of Security Architecture development.
Weaknesses:
Focusing solely on creating business models and teaching stakeholders how to interpret them does not directly address cultural and positional concerns about job loss, skill development, and security.
Risk management is addressed as part of Security Architecture development but lacks broader integration into stakeholder requirements.
Conclusion: Incorrect, as it fails to systematically document stakeholder concerns and map them into requirements and architecture decisions.
Option B:
Strengths:
Highlights the importance of formal stakeholder identification and creating a Communication Plan. Suggests addressing stakeholder concerns through communication and risk management. Weaknesses:
Does not go into detail on analyzing stakeholder concerns, cultural positions, or specific requirements.
Lacks the inclusion of stakeholder feedback in architecture artifacts like the Architecture Vision or Requirements Specification, which are critical TOGAF outputs.
Conclusion: Incorrect, as it does not include a systematic and structured approach for stakeholder analysis and integration into architecture deliverables.
Option C:
Strengths:
Emphasizes conducting a thorough stakeholder analysis to document concerns, positions, and cultural factors, which aligns with TOGAF’s approach in Phase A (Architecture Vision).
Ensures stakeholder views and requirements are recorded in the Architecture Vision document and reflected in the Architecture Requirements Specification.
Includes continuous assessment and feedback, ensuring concerns are addressed and risks managed effectively.
Aligns with TOGAF’s principle of involving stakeholders in architecture development to ensure alignment and success.
Weaknesses:
Could further detail how risk management is included across all phases, but this is implied through integration into the Architecture Requirements Specification.
Conclusion: Correct, as it provides a structured and detailed approach for addressing stakeholder concerns and managing risks within TOGAF’s framework.
Option D:
Strengths:
Suggests categorizing stakeholders into groups and creating models for each category. Proposes arranging meetings to verify that concerns have been addressed. Includes risk management as part of the process. Weaknesses:
Dividing stakeholders into generic categories (e.g., corporate functions, project team) may not adequately capture specific cultural factors and concerns raised in the scenario.
Lacks integration of stakeholder feedback into architecture deliverables such as the Architecture Vision and Architecture Requirements Specification.
Conclusion: Incorrect, as it provides a generalized and less targeted approach to stakeholder concerns compared to Option C.
TOGAF
Reference
Stakeholder Management (Phase A): TOGAF emphasizes analyzing stakeholders’ positions, concerns, and issues to shape architecture development and communication (TOGAF 9.2, Section 24.2).
Architecture Vision: Captures high-level requirements and stakeholder views to ensure alignment with business goals (TOGAF 9.2, Section 6.2).
Architecture Requirements Specification: Records detailed requirements, including those related to risk management, to guide the development of target architectures (TOGAF 9.2, Section 35.5).
Iterative Feedback: Regular assessments and feedback loops are critical to ensure stakeholder concerns are addressed effectively throughout the ADM cycle.
By selecting Option C, the approach adheres to TOGAF’s principles of stakeholder analysis, communication, and integration of concerns into architecture development.
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are working as an Enterprise Architect at a large supermarket. The company runs many retail stores, as well as an online grocery shop. Many of the stores used to remain open 24/7, but the number has decreased in recent years. Instead, they now focus on fulfilling online orders during the night.
The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice and uses the TOGAF standard for its architecture development method. The EA practice is involved in all aspects of the business, with oversight provided by an Architecture Board with representatives from different parts of the business. The EA program is sponsored by the Chief Information Officer (CIO).
Each store uses a standard method to track sales and inventory. This involves sending accurate timely sales data to a central Al-based inventory management system that can predict demand, adjust stock levels and automate reordering. The central inventory management system is housed at the company’s central data center.
The company has bought a major rival. The Chief Executive Officer believes that a merger will enable growth through combined offerings and cost savings. The decision has been taken to fully integrate the two organizations, including merging retail operations and systems. This means that duplicated systems will be replaced with one standard retail management system. Also, the
company will reduce the number of applications that are used. The CIO expects significant savings will be achieved by implementing these changes across the newly merged company.
One improvement that the rival has successfully implemented is the use of hand-held devices within stores, for both customers and staff. This has increased both customer and staff employee satisfaction due to the time savings this has brought. The CIO has given the go-ahead to roll out the devices in all stores but has stated that training on how to use the hand-held devices should be brief because there are a lot of employees, many of whom are part-time.
The Request for Architecture Work to oversee the merger has been approved. The project has been scoped and you have been assigned to work on it. Your role includes managing the architecture for the retail stores.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked to confirm the most relevant architecture principles for the transformation.
Based on the TOGAF Standard, which of the following is the best answer?
[Note: The sequence of the principles listed in each answer does not matter. You should assume the company follows the set of principles that are provided in the TOGAF Standard, ADM Techniques, Architecture Principles chapter. You may need to refer to section 2.6 located in ADM Techniques within the reference text to answer this question.]
- A . Maximize Benefit to the Enterprise, Common Use Applications, Data is an Asset, Responsive Change Management, Technology Independence
- B . Control Technical Diversity, Interoperability, Data is an Asset, Data is Shared, Business Continuity
- C . Common Vocabulary and Data Definitions, Compliance with the Law, Requirements Based Change, Responsive Change Management, Data Security
- D . Common Use Applications, Data is an Asset, Data is Accessible, Ease of Use, Business Continuity
A
Explanation:
Key aspects of the scenario:
Business Objective:
A merger is happening to combine offerings, reduce costs, and achieve operational efficiency.
The goal includes fully integrating retail operations and systems, replacing duplicated systems, and reducing the number of applications used.
Technological Improvements:
A central AI-based inventory system is in place.
Hand-held devices for stores have improved customer and staff satisfaction and increased efficiency.
Scope of Architecture Work:
Integrating the merged systems.
Managing retail architecture to optimize operations.
TOGAF Alignment:
TOGAF principles aim to ensure the architecture supports business transformation effectively while aligning with governance and best practices.
Best answer analysis:
Option 1:
Maximize Benefit to the Enterprise: Aligns with the merger goals of cost reduction and efficiency.
Common Use Applications: Matches the goal to reduce duplicated systems.
Data is an Asset: Central AI system depends on accurate and reliable data.
Responsive Change Management: Necessary to support the transition and manage organizational impacts.
Technology Independence: Encourages selecting flexible, scalable solutions post-merger.
This option comprehensively aligns with the scenario.
Option 2:
Control Technical Diversity: Important but less emphasized than cost reduction and application unification.
Interoperability: Relevant, but less critical compared to principles addressing business value.
Data is an Asset: Relevant.
Data is Shared: Implied in centralized inventory but not directly stated.
Business Continuity: Important but not the main focus here.
This option partially fits but lacks emphasis on business outcomes.
Option 3:
Common Vocabulary and Data Definitions: Indirectly helpful but not central to the transformation.
Compliance with the Law: Always critical, but no explicit legal issues are mentioned.
Requirements-Based Change: General principle but not transformation-specific.
Responsive Change Management: Relevant.
Data Security: Important but not a central concern in the scenario. This option focuses more on governance and less on merger goals.
Option 4:
Common Use Applications: Relevant to reducing duplicate systems.
Data is an Asset: Relevant.
Data is Accessible: Fits with AI system and handheld devices but is a subset of "Data is an Asset."
Ease of Use: Relevant to handheld devices but not a core transformation principle.
Business Continuity: Important but secondary to cost and efficiency.
This option focuses more on usability and accessibility rather than transformation objectives.
You are working as an Enterprise Architect within an Enterprise Architecture (EA) team at a multinational energy company. The company is committed to becoming a net-zero emissions energy business by 2050. To achieve this, the company is focusing on shifting to renewable energy production and adopting eco-friendly practices.
The EA team, which reports to the Chief Technical Officer (CTO), has been tasked with overseeing the transformation to make the company more effective through acquisitions. The company plans to fully integrate these acquisitions, including merging operations and systems.
To address the integration challenges, the EA team leader wants to know how to manage risks and ensure that the company succeeds with the proposed changes. Based on the TOGAF Standard, which of the following is the best answer?
- A . The EA team should create a Business Scenario to fully describe the business problem that is being addressed by the transformation. Once requirements are identified, they should be evaluated in terms of risks. Any residual risks should be escalated to the Architecture Board.
- B . The EA team should develop Business Architecture views that demonstrate how stakeholder concerns are addressed and assess each factor for readiness, urgency, and degree of difficulty.
- C . The EA team should evaluate the company’s readiness for change by identifying factors that will impact the transformation. These factors will be used to determine initial risks associated with the initiative.
- D . The EA team should document the risks associated with the transformation in an Implementation Factor Catalog to inform decisions during implementation and deployment.
A
Explanation:
In TOGAF, creating a Business Scenario is a foundational step in defining and understanding the business problem, especially for complex transformations involving multiple stakeholders andsystems, such as in this scenario. This method aligns with Phase A (Architecture Vision) of the TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM). Here’s why this approach is the most effective:
Understanding Business Requirements: A Business Scenario provides a structured way to capture and analyze the business requirements, stakeholder concerns, and the contextual elements related to the problem. In this scenario, the company faces challenges in integrating newly acquired companies with existing operations, which includes complex stakeholder concerns across different functional areas. Developing a Business Scenario allows the EA team to break down these complexities into identifiable and manageable parts.
Risk Evaluation and Management: By using the Business Scenario approach, the EA team can not only define the requirements but also assess associated risks systematically. TOGAF emphasizes the importance of risk management through identifying potential risks, evaluating their impact, and defining strategies for handling these risks. The process includes assessing how risks can be avoided, transferred, or reduced―a necessary step in large-scale transformations to ensure that risks are proactively managed.
Residual Risks and Governance: Any risks that cannot be fully resolved should be identified as residual risks and escalated to the Architecture Board, which is aligned with TOGAF’s governance approach. The Architecture Board’s role in TOGAF is to provide oversight and make critical decisions on risks that exceed the control of the EA team. This ensures that unresolved risks are managed at the appropriate level of the organization.
Alignment with TOGAF ADM Phases: The Business Scenario approach directly aligns with the Preliminary and Architecture Vision phases of the TOGAF ADM, which focuses on establishing a baseline understanding of the business context and the strategic transformation required. The detailed understanding of requirements, stakeholder concerns, and risks identified here will guide the subsequent phases of the ADM, including Business Architecture and Information Systems Architecture.
TOGAF Reference (Section 2.6, ADM Techniques): TOGAF provides guidelines on the creation of Business Scenarios as part of ADM Techniques, highlighting the importance of defining a business problem comprehensively to ensure successful transformation. This method includes identification of stakeholders, business requirements, and associated risks, which aligns well with the company’s need for strategic and systematic integration of new business units.
By utilizing a Business Scenario, the EA team ensures that all aspects of the transformation are well understood, risks are identified early, and residual risks are managed effectively, aligning with the company’s strategic objectives and the TOGAF framework’s guidance on risk management and stakeholder alignment.
You are working as an Enterprise Architect within an Enterprise Architecture (EA) team at a large government agency with multiple divisions. The agency has a well-established EA practice and follows the TOGAF standard as its method for architecture development. The government has mandated that the agency prepare for an "AI-first" world.
The agency wants to determine the impact and role of AI in its future services. The CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to explore the use of AI in services. Some leaders are concerned about reliance on AI, security, and employees’ need to acquire new skills.
The EA team leader seeks suggestions on managing the risks associated with a new architecture for the AI-first project.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?
- A . Conduct an analysis of stakeholders, documenting their concerns and recording them in the Architecture Vision document. Risks should be recorded in the Architecture Requirements Specification and reviewed regularly.
- B . Identify key stakeholders and develop a Communication Plan that addresses their needs. Ensure the architecture addresses risk management and summarizes features of the architecture.
- C . Separate stakeholders into groups and categorize them. Develop models for each group and verify that their concerns are addressed in Phase G, Implementation Governance.
- D . Create an organization map to show the links between different agency parts. Hold a meeting to teach stakeholders to interpret the models. Manage risks as part of Security Architecture development.
A
Explanation:
In the context of the TOGAF standard, stakeholder management and addressing stakeholder concerns are critical components, especially for high-impact initiatives like adopting an AI-first approach. Here’s why the selected answer aligns best with TOGAF principles and the scenario:
Stakeholder Analysis and Engagement: Conducting a stakeholder analysis is essential as it helps identify and document the concerns, issues, and cultural factors influencing each stakeholder group. This aligns with TOGAF’s emphasis on understanding and managing stakeholder concerns, particularly in the Preliminary and Architecture Vision phases of the ADM (Architecture Development Method). Since the scenario highlights diverse concerns about AI, understanding each group’s unique perspective will help the EA team tailor the architecture to address these effectively.
Architecture Vision Document: By documenting these concerns in the Architecture Vision document, the EA team can provide a clear, high-level representation of how AI will be adopted, its benefits, and how it addresses specific stakeholder concerns. This is critical for communicating the intent and value of the AI-first approach in a way that aligns with the agency’s strategic goals, including addressing apprehensions about job security, skill development, and cyber resilience.
Risk Management and Architecture Requirements Specification: TOGAF highlights the importance of identifying and managing risks early in the process. By documenting the requirements related to risk in the Architecture Requirements Specification, the EA team ensures that these concerns are formally integrated into the architecture and addressed throughout the ADM phases. Regular assessments and feedback loops will provide a mechanism for continual risk monitoring and adjustment as the AI-first initiative progresses.
Alignment with TOGAF’s ADM Phases: The approach specified aligns with TOGAF’s guidance on
managing risk and stakeholder concerns during the early ADM phases, specifically Architecture Vision and Requirements Management. In these phases, the framework emphasizes identifying and addressing risks associated with stakeholders’ concerns to build a resilient and widely accepted architecture.
Reference to TOGAF Stakeholder Management Techniques: TOGAF’s stakeholder management techniques underscore the importance of understanding and addressing stakeholder needs as a foundational step. This involves assessing the influence and interest of various stakeholders and integrating their views into architectural development, ensuring that the architecture aligns with both business goals and operational realities.
In conclusion, by conducting a thorough stakeholder analysis and documenting concerns in both the Architecture Vision and Architecture Requirements Specification, the EA team can ensure that stakeholder concerns are addressed, that the architecture supports AI adoption effectively, and that potential risks are managed proactively. This approach will foster acceptance among stakeholders and ensure that the architecture aligns with the agency’s strategic goals and risk management requirements as recommended by TOGAF.
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are employed as an Enterprise Architect in a team at a large company. The company sells luxury food and drinks in more than 10,000 stores worldwide. The company is a leader in using technology to connect with its customers. This includes online ordering, mobile apps, and rewards programs. The company is also famous for bringing new ideas to the market, like ordering through apps, using Al to suggest personalized options, self-service pickup stations, and changing prices based on demand.
The stores are open every day. They send timely sales data to a central system that manages inventory. This system can predict what products are needed, adjust how much stock there is, and order more stock automatically. The stores and the main inventory system work directly with the mobile apps, allowing orders to be made online. The central inventory system is located at the company’s main data center.
The company will merge with a major competitor. This competitor has a synergistic business. Leaders from both companies have told shareholders that the merger will happen fast. There will be minimal impact for customers. All stores will keep the current brand names. They will combine their systems, choosing the best ones to use. This means their store management and back-office systems will become one. They will stop using duplicate systems and use one main system to manage the stores.
They will also cut down on the number of back-office applications they use.
The Request for Architecture Work to oversee the merger has been approved. Stakeholders, concerns, and business requirements have been identified. The stakeholders have made it clear that they expect to continue to be able to innovate quickly, and that changes should not restrict that capability. The scope of what is inside and what is outside the architecture efforts has been confirmed. The next step is to revisit and review the Architecture Principles, as they form part of the constraints on architecture work.
Business Continuity is essential given that the business depends on real-time ordering and automated inventory management. During the systems integration, maintaining service for customers and inventory operations must be prioritized
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked to identify the most relevant Architecture Principles for the merger besides Business Continuity.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?
[Note: You should assume that the company follows the example set of Architecture Principles provided in the TOGAF standard, ADM Techniques, Architecture Principles chapter.]
- A . Control Technical Diversity will help by standardizing technology platforms as part of the integration process. This will be vital for standardizing the app integration for digital orders with the back-office systems, and will reduce complexity and costs during integration. Data Trustee will establish owners to manage the shared data across the company, thereby assuring data quality. Ease-of-Use is needed to make sure that new user interfaces for the apps continue to be easy to use.
- B . Primacy of Principles will make sure that the same principles apply to both organizations of the newly merged operation, creating consistency across locations. Data as an Asset is critical. Since you’re maintaining separate mobile apps but consolidating back-end systems, treating data as an asset becomes essential. This principle helps ensure that customer data, and inventory information from both brands are properly integrated and managed. Technology Independence is important when consolidating the back-office applications and order processing systems.
- C . Compliance with the Law makes sure that all company activities comply with relevant laws and regulations. This principle provides the foundation for ensuring the merger meets all legal requirements. Requirements-Based Change will make sure that when combining systems, changes to applications and technology are only made if required by business needs. Responsive Change Management focuses on the speed needed to achieve the goals set by the leaders for a quick merger. We are committed to quickly blending the companies as planned.
- D . Service orientation will speed up the merger and make it easier to integrate systems while maintaining business operations. Maximize Benefit to the Enterprise will make sure that merger decisions prioritize the overall benefit to the combined company. Common Use Applications across the merged company is preferred over the use of similar or duplicative applications for certain parts of the company. This help supports the goal of merging back-office systems to reduce duplication.
D
Explanation:
You are asked to identify the most relevant Architecture Principles, besides Business Continuity, that apply to a rapid merger, where:
Back-office and store management systems will be consolidated
Duplicate applications will be eliminated
Innovation must remain fast
Customer experience must remain uninterrupted
Combined enterprise value is the priority
TOGAF’s example Architecture Principles include four main categories:
Business Principles
Data Principles
Application Principles
Technology Principles
Option D contains the principles that best support the specific needs of the merger as described.
✔ Why Option D is correct
What are the three levels of the Architecture Landscape?
- A . Segment, Enterprise Strategic, and Capability Architectures
- B . Baseline, Transition, and To-Be Architectures
- C . Gaps, Plateaus, and Target Architectures
- D . Transitional, Complete, and Incremental Architectures
B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation from Expert in Enterprise Architecture, guiding in TOGAF and ArchiMate:
The Architecture Landscape in TOGAF describes the state of architectures across time and change. It provides a temporal view that allows enterprises to plan, govern, and manage transformation.
The three levels of the Architecture Landscape are:
Baseline Architecture C the current, “as-is” state of the enterprise
Transition Architectures C intermediate, planned states that move the enterprise from Baseline to Target Target (To-Be) Architecture C the desired future state
Why Option B is correct:
These three levels represent TOGAF’s standard classification of architecture states within the Architecture Landscape.
Why the other options are incorrect: