Practice Free CCCS-203b Exam Online Questions
Question #41
A company is deploying CrowdStrike Falcon runtime protection in a Kubernetes environment running both stateful and stateless workloads across multiple cloud providers. They require real-time threat detection, minimal performance overhead, and compatibility with their Kubernetes clusters.
Which Falcon sensor should they use?
- A . Falcon Windows Sensor, installed on Kubernetes nodes to provide visibility into containerized applications.
- B . Falcon Complete, as it provides fully managed endpoint detection and response (EDR) for Kubernetes containers.
- C . Falcon Container Sensor, deployed as a DaemonSet, for full runtime protection of containerized workloads.
- D . Falcon Linux Sensor, installed on every Kubernetes node to provide per-container monitoring.
Correct Answer: C
C
Explanation:
Option A: The Falcon Windows Sensor is not designed for Kubernetes environments, which predominantly run on Linux-based containers.
Option B: Falcon Complete offers a managed EDR service but is not a sensor specifically optimized for Kubernetes container security.
Option C: The Falcon Container Sensor deployed as a DaemonSet is the best choice for runtime protection in Kubernetes environments. It ensures real-time detection and prevention of container threats while minimizing overhead.
Option D: While the Falcon Linux Sensor provides security for Linux-based systems, it is not optimized for containerized workloads running in Kubernetes environments.
C
Explanation:
Option A: The Falcon Windows Sensor is not designed for Kubernetes environments, which predominantly run on Linux-based containers.
Option B: Falcon Complete offers a managed EDR service but is not a sensor specifically optimized for Kubernetes container security.
Option C: The Falcon Container Sensor deployed as a DaemonSet is the best choice for runtime protection in Kubernetes environments. It ensures real-time detection and prevention of container threats while minimizing overhead.
Option D: While the Falcon Linux Sensor provides security for Linux-based systems, it is not optimized for containerized workloads running in Kubernetes environments.
Question #42
What is required to successfully register a cloud account with CrowdStrike Falcon?
- A . A user must manually whitelist all workloads in the cloud account before integrating with CrowdStrike Falcon.
- B . Administrative credentials with programmatic access to the cloud account are required to enable Falcon integration and access resources.
- C . Read-only access to the cloud account is sufficient for monitoring and configuration with Falcon.
- D . The cloud account must have an existing CrowdStrike agent installed on all workloads.
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
Option A: While Falcon provides visibility into workloads, manual whitelisting of workloads is not a requirement for account registration. The platform automatically discovers workloads after the account is successfully registered and integrated.
Option B: Administrative credentials with programmatic access allow CrowdStrike Falcon to integrate with the cloud account, retrieve resource metadata, monitor activity, and enforce security controls. These credentials are typically granted through roles or policies in the cloud provider’s management console.
Option C: Read-only access is not sufficient because Falcon requires permissions to execute specific tasks, such as managing policies, detecting misconfigurations, and enforcing security controls. Administrative credentials with programmatic access are essential for full functionality.
Option D: Installing the CrowdStrike agent on workloads is a separate step after account registration. Cloud account registration focuses on setting up access and permissions to integrate with Falcon for visibility and management. The agent installation is workload-specific, not account-level.
B
Explanation:
Option A: While Falcon provides visibility into workloads, manual whitelisting of workloads is not a requirement for account registration. The platform automatically discovers workloads after the account is successfully registered and integrated.
Option B: Administrative credentials with programmatic access allow CrowdStrike Falcon to integrate with the cloud account, retrieve resource metadata, monitor activity, and enforce security controls. These credentials are typically granted through roles or policies in the cloud provider’s management console.
Option C: Read-only access is not sufficient because Falcon requires permissions to execute specific tasks, such as managing policies, detecting misconfigurations, and enforcing security controls. Administrative credentials with programmatic access are essential for full functionality.
Option D: Installing the CrowdStrike agent on workloads is a separate step after account registration. Cloud account registration focuses on setting up access and permissions to integrate with Falcon for visibility and management. The agent installation is workload-specific, not account-level.
Question #43
A security team has identified an outdated Kubernetes Admission Controller policy in Falcon Cloud Security that enforces image signing requirements for container workloads. They need to update the policy to align with new organizational guidelines.
What is the most appropriate way to edit this policy?
- A . Modify the existing policy directly in the Falcon Cloud Security Console.
- B . Export the existing policy as a YAML file, edit it locally, and re-import it to Falcon Cloud Security.
- C . Disable the existing policy in Falcon Cloud Security and replace it with a new Kubernetes ConfigMap.
- D . Delete the current policy and create a new one from scratch.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Option A: The Falcon Cloud Security Console provides tools to edit existing policies, ensuring that changes are implemented efficiently without creating redundant configurations or policies.
Option B: Falcon Cloud Security does not require exporting and re-importing YAML files for policy updates. Changes are made directly in the console.
Option C: Falcon Cloud Security Admission Controller policies are managed in the Falcon Console, not through Kubernetes ConfigMaps. Disabling and replacing the policy is not the correct approach.
Option D: Deleting and recreating the policy is unnecessary and could introduce downtime or configuration gaps. Editing the policy is more efficient and preserves continuity.
A
Explanation:
Option A: The Falcon Cloud Security Console provides tools to edit existing policies, ensuring that changes are implemented efficiently without creating redundant configurations or policies.
Option B: Falcon Cloud Security does not require exporting and re-importing YAML files for policy updates. Changes are made directly in the console.
Option C: Falcon Cloud Security Admission Controller policies are managed in the Falcon Console, not through Kubernetes ConfigMaps. Disabling and replacing the policy is not the correct approach.
Option D: Deleting and recreating the policy is unnecessary and could introduce downtime or configuration gaps. Editing the policy is more efficient and preserves continuity.
Question #44
You are tasked with creating a scheduled report for Indicators of Attack (IOAs) and Indicators of Maliciousness (IOMs) in the CrowdStrike platform.
Which step is crucial to ensure the report provides actionable insights for your security team?
- A . Set the report frequency to once a year for minimal operational impact.
- B . Share the report exclusively with the executive team.
- C . Configure filters to exclude benign detections and focus on high-severity threats.
- D . Include only IOAs in the report to minimize data volume.
Correct Answer: C
C
Explanation:
Option A: An annual report frequency is insufficient for real-time threat mitigation. Security teams require more frequent updates, such as daily or weekly, to respond effectively to emerging threats.
Option B: While executives need summaries, sharing reports exclusively with them prevents the security team from accessing actionable insights necessary for day-to-day threat response.
Option C: Configuring filters ensures that the report highlights relevant and actionable threats. Excluding benign detections reduces noise and allows the security team to focus on critical IOAs and IOMs, improving response efficiency. Mismanaging filters can overwhelm the team with unnecessary data or omit key threats.
Option D: Limiting the report to IOAs ignores IOMs, which are critical for understanding malicious patterns. Both indicators are essential for a comprehensive threat landscape view.
C
Explanation:
Option A: An annual report frequency is insufficient for real-time threat mitigation. Security teams require more frequent updates, such as daily or weekly, to respond effectively to emerging threats.
Option B: While executives need summaries, sharing reports exclusively with them prevents the security team from accessing actionable insights necessary for day-to-day threat response.
Option C: Configuring filters ensures that the report highlights relevant and actionable threats. Excluding benign detections reduces noise and allows the security team to focus on critical IOAs and IOMs, improving response efficiency. Mismanaging filters can overwhelm the team with unnecessary data or omit key threats.
Option D: Limiting the report to IOAs ignores IOMs, which are critical for understanding malicious patterns. Both indicators are essential for a comprehensive threat landscape view.
Question #45
A cloud security team needs to monitor infrastructure as code (IaC) deployments and container image assessments to ensure compliance with cloud security policies. They want to create an automated workflow that sends alerts to DevOps engineers if a newly deployed container image fails a security assessment or if an IaC configuration violates industry compliance benchmarks.
Which Falcon Fusion SOAR capability should they use to accomplish this?
- A . Event-Based Workflow Triggers
- B . Falcon Spotlight for Vulnerability Management
- C . Falcon Prevent (NGAV) for Malware Prevention
- D . Falcon XDR for Data Correlation
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Option A: Falcon Fusion SOAR can automatically trigger workflows based on specific events, such as failed image assessments or infrastructure as code policy violations. These workflows can notify DevOps teams via email, Slack, or ticketing systems (e.g., Jira) and enforce compliance in real time.
Option B: Falcon Spotlight helps identify vulnerabilities in workloads, but it does not automate compliance reporting or notify DevOps teams of failed assessments. It focuses on patch management recommendations rather than workflow automation.
Option C: Falcon Prevent helps block malware and known threats, but it does not monitor cloud compliance or trigger alerts for failed security assessments related to container images or IaC configurations.
Option D: Falcon XDR provides advanced correlation of security data from multiple sources, but it does not trigger automated workflows for DevOps alerts or IaC security compliance monitoring.
A
Explanation:
Option A: Falcon Fusion SOAR can automatically trigger workflows based on specific events, such as failed image assessments or infrastructure as code policy violations. These workflows can notify DevOps teams via email, Slack, or ticketing systems (e.g., Jira) and enforce compliance in real time.
Option B: Falcon Spotlight helps identify vulnerabilities in workloads, but it does not automate compliance reporting or notify DevOps teams of failed assessments. It focuses on patch management recommendations rather than workflow automation.
Option C: Falcon Prevent helps block malware and known threats, but it does not monitor cloud compliance or trigger alerts for failed security assessments related to container images or IaC configurations.
Option D: Falcon XDR provides advanced correlation of security data from multiple sources, but it does not trigger automated workflows for DevOps alerts or IaC security compliance monitoring.
Question #46
You are tasked with assigning policies in a cloud environment using CrowdStrike’s Identity Analyzer.
Which of the following configurations aligns best with the principle of least privilege?
- A . Assigning identical policies to all users regardless of their roles or responsibilities.
- B . Granting unrestricted administrative privileges to all roles to ensure productivity.
- C . Assigning a single, broad policy to grant all users access to all cloud services.
- D . Creating role-based policies that restrict access to only the services and actions necessary for specific job functions.
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
Option A: A one-size-fits-all approach ignores the unique requirements of different roles and leads to over-permissioning or under-permissioning, both of which are undesirable from a security perspective.
Option B: Granting administrative privileges universally undermines security and increases the likelihood of human error or exploitation. Only specific roles requiring administrative capabilities should have such access.
Option C: Broad policies that grant universal access violate the principle of least privilege. They expose the environment to unnecessary risks, such as unauthorized data access or resource modification.
Option D: This approach follows the principle of least privilege, ensuring users and roles have access only to the resources and actions required for their responsibilities. This minimizes the attack surface, reduces the risk of accidental or malicious misuse, and adheres to best practices in identity and access management.
D
Explanation:
Option A: A one-size-fits-all approach ignores the unique requirements of different roles and leads to over-permissioning or under-permissioning, both of which are undesirable from a security perspective.
Option B: Granting administrative privileges universally undermines security and increases the likelihood of human error or exploitation. Only specific roles requiring administrative capabilities should have such access.
Option C: Broad policies that grant universal access violate the principle of least privilege. They expose the environment to unnecessary risks, such as unauthorized data access or resource modification.
Option D: This approach follows the principle of least privilege, ensuring users and roles have access only to the resources and actions required for their responsibilities. This minimizes the attack surface, reduces the risk of accidental or malicious misuse, and adheres to best practices in identity and access management.
Question #47
What is the most efficient way to detect rogue containers and identify drift in containerized workloads in a cloud environment?
- A . Utilizing Falcon Discover to perform agentless scanning for rogue containers.
- B . Using Falcon Horizon to audit Kubernetes configurations.
- C . Configuring Falcon CWP to monitor container lifecycle and detect drift.
- D . Deploying manual container inspection scripts to identify runtime anomalies.
Correct Answer: C
C
Explanation:
Option A: Falcon Discover provides visibility into assets and cloud workloads, but it does not offer runtime monitoring or drift detection capabilities. It is useful for inventory purposes, not runtime protection.
Option B: Falcon Horizon focuses on misconfiguration detection and compliance for Kubernetes and other cloud platforms. While it can identify misconfigurations that might lead to rogue containers, it does not monitor runtime behaviors or detect drift.
Option C: Falcon Cloud Workload Protection (CWP) is specifically designed to monitor containerized workloads in real time, detect rogue containers, and identify drift from expected configurations. Drift detection ensures that workloads adhere to defined security baselines, while runtime protection addresses
rogue or unauthorized containers. This approach is automated and efficient.
Option D: Manual inspection scripts are labor-intensive and not scalable for dynamic containerized environments. They lack the automation and real-time capabilities provided by Falcon CWP.
C
Explanation:
Option A: Falcon Discover provides visibility into assets and cloud workloads, but it does not offer runtime monitoring or drift detection capabilities. It is useful for inventory purposes, not runtime protection.
Option B: Falcon Horizon focuses on misconfiguration detection and compliance for Kubernetes and other cloud platforms. While it can identify misconfigurations that might lead to rogue containers, it does not monitor runtime behaviors or detect drift.
Option C: Falcon Cloud Workload Protection (CWP) is specifically designed to monitor containerized workloads in real time, detect rogue containers, and identify drift from expected configurations. Drift detection ensures that workloads adhere to defined security baselines, while runtime protection addresses
rogue or unauthorized containers. This approach is automated and efficient.
Option D: Manual inspection scripts are labor-intensive and not scalable for dynamic containerized environments. They lack the automation and real-time capabilities provided by Falcon CWP.
Question #48
What is the primary purpose of creating image assessment policies within Falcon Cloud Security?
- A . To automate the deployment of container images across Kubernetes clusters.
- B . To evaluate container images for vulnerabilities and enforce security compliance during the CI/CD pipeline.
- C . To configure runtime monitoring for containerized applications in production environments.
- D . To create firewall rules for restricting network traffic between containers.
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
Option A: Deployment automation is typically handled by CI/CD tools like Jenkins, GitLab CI, or Kubernetes itself, not by Falcon Cloud Security’s image assessment policies.
Option B: Falcon Cloud Security’s image assessment policies are designed to scan container images for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and other security risks before deployment. These policies help enforce compliance standards by preventing vulnerable or non-compliant images from being deployed, ensuring a secure container lifecycle from development to production.
Option C: Runtime monitoring is a separate capability that observes live workloads, whereas image assessment policies focus on pre-deployment scanning and compliance.
Option D: Firewall rules are configured at the network or Kubernetes level, typically using tools like Calico, AWS Security Groups, or Azure NSGs, not Falcon Cloud Security image assessment policies.
B
Explanation:
Option A: Deployment automation is typically handled by CI/CD tools like Jenkins, GitLab CI, or Kubernetes itself, not by Falcon Cloud Security’s image assessment policies.
Option B: Falcon Cloud Security’s image assessment policies are designed to scan container images for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and other security risks before deployment. These policies help enforce compliance standards by preventing vulnerable or non-compliant images from being deployed, ensuring a secure container lifecycle from development to production.
Option C: Runtime monitoring is a separate capability that observes live workloads, whereas image assessment policies focus on pre-deployment scanning and compliance.
Option D: Firewall rules are configured at the network or Kubernetes level, typically using tools like Calico, AWS Security Groups, or Azure NSGs, not Falcon Cloud Security image assessment policies.
Question #49
An organization is attempting to register its AWS account with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud, but the process fails. The error message indicates insufficient permissions. The security team verifies that the CrowdStrike Falcon role was created in AWS IAM.
What is the most likely cause of this issue?
- A . The AWS account must be linked to an Azure subscription before it can be registered in CrowdStrike Falcon.
- B . The CrowdStrike Falcon Console does not support AWS account registrations unless the Falcon sensor is installed on at least one EC2 instance.
- C . The role was created, but it was not granted the required permissions or trust policy for CrowdStrike Falcon to assume it.
- D . The Falcon role needs to be assigned to an AWS Lambda function for it to be recognized during the registration process.
Correct Answer: C
C
Explanation:
Option A: There is no requirement to link AWS and Azure for Falcon integration. Each cloud provider has its own independent registration process.
Option B: Falcon sensors are not required for cloud account registration. Sensors provide endpoint protection, whereas registration integrates Falcon with AWS APIs for monitoring.
Option C: CrowdStrike Falcon requires a properly configured IAM role with the necessary permissions and a trust policy allowing Falcon to assume the role. If the trust relationship is not set up correctly, Falcon cannot access the account to complete registration.
Option D: The IAM role is not assigned to a Lambda function but is instead created for Falcon to assume. Registering a cloud account does not require Lambda integration.
C
Explanation:
Option A: There is no requirement to link AWS and Azure for Falcon integration. Each cloud provider has its own independent registration process.
Option B: Falcon sensors are not required for cloud account registration. Sensors provide endpoint protection, whereas registration integrates Falcon with AWS APIs for monitoring.
Option C: CrowdStrike Falcon requires a properly configured IAM role with the necessary permissions and a trust policy allowing Falcon to assume the role. If the trust relationship is not set up correctly, Falcon cannot access the account to complete registration.
Option D: The IAM role is not assigned to a Lambda function but is instead created for Falcon to assume. Registering a cloud account does not require Lambda integration.
Question #50
After identifying excessive permissions and missing MFA in IAM configurations, which remediation strategy is most aligned with CrowdStrike CIEM’s recommendations?
- A . Delete all accounts flagged by CIEM’s Identity Analyzer.
- B . Revoke all permissions from the identified accounts.
- C . Enable MFA and implement least privilege access policies for the flagged accounts.
- D . Transfer ownership of flagged accounts to a different administrator.
Correct Answer: C
C
Explanation:
Option A: Deleting accounts without assessing their purpose could lead to operational disruptions, especially if service accounts or critical roles are affected. CIEM focuses on remediation, not immediate deletion.
Option B: Revoking all permissions is overly disruptive and impractical. Instead, permissions should be adjusted based on the principle of least privilege to allow users to perform their roles securely.
Option C: CIEM emphasizes the principle of least privilege and the enforcement of MFA as core security practices. Adjusting permissions to align with job roles and enabling MFA significantly reduces the attack surface and prevents unauthorized access.
Option D: Transferring ownership does not address the underlying issue of excessive permissions or missing MFA. It is a superficial action that leaves the security risks unresolved.
C
Explanation:
Option A: Deleting accounts without assessing their purpose could lead to operational disruptions, especially if service accounts or critical roles are affected. CIEM focuses on remediation, not immediate deletion.
Option B: Revoking all permissions is overly disruptive and impractical. Instead, permissions should be adjusted based on the principle of least privilege to allow users to perform their roles securely.
Option C: CIEM emphasizes the principle of least privilege and the enforcement of MFA as core security practices. Adjusting permissions to align with job roles and enabling MFA significantly reduces the attack surface and prevents unauthorized access.
Option D: Transferring ownership does not address the underlying issue of excessive permissions or missing MFA. It is a superficial action that leaves the security risks unresolved.