Practice Free CCCS-203b Exam Online Questions
Question #11
When creating an API client for cloud account integration in CrowdStrike Falcon, which of the following is a required step?
- A . Configure the API client to use legacy authentication methods
- B . Assign specific API scopes to limit the client’s access
- C . Grant the API client administrator privileges to all cloud accounts
- D . Generate a public-private key pair and upload the private key to Falcon
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
Option A: This is incorrect because legacy authentication methods are less secure and not recommended.
CrowdStrike uses token-based authentication for API clients.
Option B: This is correct because assigning API scopes defines the level of access the API client has, ensuring the principle of least privilege is followed. For cloud account integration, API scopes like read, write, or view are tailored to the required tasks without over-provisioning access.
Option C: This is incorrect because granting administrator privileges violates security best practices.
Over-provisioning access can increase the risk of accidental or malicious actions.
Option D: This is incorrect because CrowdStrike Falcon requires generating API keys within the platform rather than relying on external key-pair uploads.
B
Explanation:
Option A: This is incorrect because legacy authentication methods are less secure and not recommended.
CrowdStrike uses token-based authentication for API clients.
Option B: This is correct because assigning API scopes defines the level of access the API client has, ensuring the principle of least privilege is followed. For cloud account integration, API scopes like read, write, or view are tailored to the required tasks without over-provisioning access.
Option C: This is incorrect because granting administrator privileges violates security best practices.
Over-provisioning access can increase the risk of accidental or malicious actions.
Option D: This is incorrect because CrowdStrike Falcon requires generating API keys within the platform rather than relying on external key-pair uploads.
Question #12
Which statement correctly explains how Falcon Cloud Security components work together to protect cloud environments?
- A . Falcon Cloud Security relies exclusively on the Falcon Overwatch team for threat detection, ignoring automated analytics.
- B . Falcon Cloud Security requires users to manually correlate data between different Falcon modules to identify and remediate threats.
- C . Falcon Cloud Security depends on third-party APIs for detecting and responding to misconfigurations in cloud platforms.
- D . Falcon Cloud Security integrates modules like Falcon Horizon and Falcon Prevent to detect vulnerabilities and protect workloads without manual configuration.
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
Option A: While the Falcon Overwatch team provides expert threat hunting, Falcon Cloud Security also relies on automated analytics and AI-based detection. This ensures a comprehensive approach to identifying and mitigating threats without solely depending on human oversight.
Option B: Falcon modules are designed to work together seamlessly, automatically correlating data to provide actionable insights. Manual correlation is not required, and suggesting otherwise misrepresents the platform’s automation and integration capabilities.
Option C: While Falcon Cloud Security can interact with third-party APIs for extended functionality, it has native capabilities to detect misconfigurations and threats in cloud environments. This reduces dependence on external tools.
Option D: Falcon Cloud Security leverages integration with modules like Falcon Horizon for cloud posture management and Falcon Prevent for real-time prevention. These integrations streamline vulnerability detection and workload protection without requiring extensive manual configuration.
D
Explanation:
Option A: While the Falcon Overwatch team provides expert threat hunting, Falcon Cloud Security also relies on automated analytics and AI-based detection. This ensures a comprehensive approach to identifying and mitigating threats without solely depending on human oversight.
Option B: Falcon modules are designed to work together seamlessly, automatically correlating data to provide actionable insights. Manual correlation is not required, and suggesting otherwise misrepresents the platform’s automation and integration capabilities.
Option C: While Falcon Cloud Security can interact with third-party APIs for extended functionality, it has native capabilities to detect misconfigurations and threats in cloud environments. This reduces dependence on external tools.
Option D: Falcon Cloud Security leverages integration with modules like Falcon Horizon for cloud posture management and Falcon Prevent for real-time prevention. These integrations streamline vulnerability detection and workload protection without requiring extensive manual configuration.
Question #13
You are creating a custom Indicator of Maliciousness (IOM) rule in CrowdStrike Falcon to block access to a specific malicious domain.
Which of the following steps is correct for ensuring the IOM rule functions effectively?
- A . Select the "Domain Name" condition type and specify the domain to block.
- B . Use the "File Hash" condition type to specify the domain’s IP address.
- C . Add the domain to the Global Allowlist to ensure it is blocked.
- D . Assign the IOM rule a severity level of "Informational" to ensure it blocks the domain.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Option A: This is correct because using the "Domain Name" condition type allows you to specify a particular domain as the target for the IOM rule. This ensures that CrowdStrike monitors and blocks activities related to the specified domain. Proper configuration of the condition type is essential for the rule to function as intended.
Option B: This is incorrect because "File Hash" is designed for identifying specific files based on their hash values, not for blocking domains or IP addresses. Using this type would result in an ineffective rule for domain blocking.
Option C: This is incorrect because the Allowlist is used to exclude entities from being flagged or blocked by CrowdStrike. Adding a domain to the Allowlist would prevent it from being blocked.
Option D: This is incorrect because severity levels such as "Informational" are used for categorizing the criticality of events, not for determining whether a rule will block activity. For blocking, the rule’s action type must explicitly include "Block."
A
Explanation:
Option A: This is correct because using the "Domain Name" condition type allows you to specify a particular domain as the target for the IOM rule. This ensures that CrowdStrike monitors and blocks activities related to the specified domain. Proper configuration of the condition type is essential for the rule to function as intended.
Option B: This is incorrect because "File Hash" is designed for identifying specific files based on their hash values, not for blocking domains or IP addresses. Using this type would result in an ineffective rule for domain blocking.
Option C: This is incorrect because the Allowlist is used to exclude entities from being flagged or blocked by CrowdStrike. Adding a domain to the Allowlist would prevent it from being blocked.
Option D: This is incorrect because severity levels such as "Informational" are used for categorizing the criticality of events, not for determining whether a rule will block activity. For blocking, the rule’s action type must explicitly include "Block."
Question #14
A security team wants to modify existing registry connection settings in CrowdStrike Falcon to enhance pre-runtime security protections.
Which of the following best describes the correct process for updating these settings?
- A . Allow all images from a registry once it has been added, even if authentication settings or security policies change.
- B . Delete and recreate the registry connection from scratch every time a setting needs to be updated.
- C . Disable all scanning policies when making changes to registry settings to avoid configuration errors.
- D . Edit the registry connection details in the Falcon console, update authentication credentials if necessary, and apply changes to scanning policies.
Correct Answer: D
D
Explanation:
Option A: Simply adding a registry does not guarantee security. Administrators must continuously update policies and authentication settings as needed.
Option B: Deleting and recreating registry connections every time is unnecessary and can cause disruptions to security operations. Editing is a more efficient approach.
Option C: Disabling scanning policies during configuration updates is risky. Instead, updates should be made carefully while maintaining security protections.
Option D: Administrators should edit registry connection details in the Falcon console, update authentication credentials as needed, and modify scanning policies to enhance security.
D
Explanation:
Option A: Simply adding a registry does not guarantee security. Administrators must continuously update policies and authentication settings as needed.
Option B: Deleting and recreating registry connections every time is unnecessary and can cause disruptions to security operations. Editing is a more efficient approach.
Option C: Disabling scanning policies during configuration updates is risky. Instead, updates should be made carefully while maintaining security protections.
Option D: Administrators should edit registry connection details in the Falcon console, update authentication credentials as needed, and modify scanning policies to enhance security.
Question #15
You are using the CrowdStrike Falcon platform to review a container image for vulnerabilities. During the analysis, the platform identifies a critical vulnerability in one of the installed packages.
What is the next best action to mitigate this vulnerability effectively?
- A . Deploy the container image as-is but monitor it closely for suspicious activity.
- B . Immediately delete the container image and rebuild it from scratch.
- C . Upgrade the vulnerable package to a non-vulnerable version and re-scan the image.
- D . Report the vulnerability to the development team and delay addressing it until the next release cycle.
Correct Answer: C
C
Explanation:
Option A: Monitoring does not address the root cause and leaves the system vulnerable to exploitation.
Prevention is better than detection in this context.
Option B: This approach may ensure a fresh start, but it is unnecessarily drastic and inefficient.
Upgrading the vulnerable package within the existing image is typically sufficient and more practical.
Option C: This is the recommended practice for addressing vulnerabilities. Updating the specific package ensures the image is secure while maintaining functionality. Re-scanning verifies the vulnerability is resolved.
Option D: Postponing mitigation can leave your systems exposed to security risks. Critical vulnerabilities should be addressed immediately.
C
Explanation:
Option A: Monitoring does not address the root cause and leaves the system vulnerable to exploitation.
Prevention is better than detection in this context.
Option B: This approach may ensure a fresh start, but it is unnecessarily drastic and inefficient.
Upgrading the vulnerable package within the existing image is typically sufficient and more practical.
Option C: This is the recommended practice for addressing vulnerabilities. Updating the specific package ensures the image is secure while maintaining functionality. Re-scanning verifies the vulnerability is resolved.
Option D: Postponing mitigation can leave your systems exposed to security risks. Critical vulnerabilities should be addressed immediately.
Question #16
Which permission is typically required for CrowdStrike Falcon to successfully register and monitor a cloud account?
- A . Access to the root account credentials
- B . IAM role with read-only permissions for specific services
- C . Administrator Access policy for full control of the cloud account
- D . Granting SSH access to all cloud-hosted virtual machines
Correct Answer: B
B
Explanation:
Option A: This is incorrect because using root credentials poses significant security risks and is not a best practice. IAM roles are the recommended method for securely granting access.
Option B: This is correct because CrowdStrike Falcon requires an IAM role with read-only permissions to access and monitor cloud services, configurations, and logs. This minimizes risk while providing sufficient visibility into the cloud account for security monitoring.
Option C: This is incorrect because granting full administrative access is unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. CrowdStrike does not require full control to monitor cloud accounts.
Option D: This is incorrect because SSH access is irrelevant to the cloud account registration process.
CrowdStrike monitors at the account and service level rather than accessing individual instances directly.
B
Explanation:
Option A: This is incorrect because using root credentials poses significant security risks and is not a best practice. IAM roles are the recommended method for securely granting access.
Option B: This is correct because CrowdStrike Falcon requires an IAM role with read-only permissions to access and monitor cloud services, configurations, and logs. This minimizes risk while providing sufficient visibility into the cloud account for security monitoring.
Option C: This is incorrect because granting full administrative access is unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. CrowdStrike does not require full control to monitor cloud accounts.
Option D: This is incorrect because SSH access is irrelevant to the cloud account registration process.
CrowdStrike monitors at the account and service level rather than accessing individual instances directly.
Question #17
Which of the following is a necessary requirement for deploying the Kubernetes protection agent in a containerized environment?
- A . Ensure the Kubernetes cluster has role-based access control (RBAC) enabled to support the agent’s permissions.
- B . Enable the default Kubernetes audit logs and assume the agent will integrate without additional configuration.
- C . Assign full administrative privileges to all service accounts in the Kubernetes cluster.
- D . Install the agent directly on each container running within the Kubernetes cluster.
Correct Answer: A
A
Explanation:
Option A: RBAC is a critical requirement for deploying the Kubernetes protection agent. It ensures that the agent has the necessary permissions to monitor and protect the cluster effectively. Without proper RBAC configuration, the agent cannot access required resources or enforce security policies.
Option B: While enabling Kubernetes audit logs is a good practice for security monitoring, it is not a substitute for configuring the Kubernetes protection agent. The agent requires additional setup to monitor and protect workloads effectively.
Option C: Granting full administrative privileges to all service accounts violates the principle of least privilege and increases the attack surface. The agent requires specific permissions, which can be granted using RBAC without over-provisioning access.
Option D: Installing the agent directly on individual containers is not how the Kubernetes protection agent operates. The agent is deployed at the node level or via DaemonSet to monitor containerized workloads across the cluster.
A
Explanation:
Option A: RBAC is a critical requirement for deploying the Kubernetes protection agent. It ensures that the agent has the necessary permissions to monitor and protect the cluster effectively. Without proper RBAC configuration, the agent cannot access required resources or enforce security policies.
Option B: While enabling Kubernetes audit logs is a good practice for security monitoring, it is not a substitute for configuring the Kubernetes protection agent. The agent requires additional setup to monitor and protect workloads effectively.
Option C: Granting full administrative privileges to all service accounts violates the principle of least privilege and increases the attack surface. The agent requires specific permissions, which can be granted using RBAC without over-provisioning access.
Option D: Installing the agent directly on individual containers is not how the Kubernetes protection agent operates. The agent is deployed at the node level or via DaemonSet to monitor containerized workloads across the cluster.
Question #18
After performing an image assessment in Falcon Cloud Security, which of the following is a typical actionable recommendation?
- A . Disable unused Kubernetes Admission Controllers.
- B . Apply a pod security policy to restrict privileged containers.
- C . Update container images to address identified critical vulnerabilities.
- D . Limit the number of pods per node to prevent resource exhaustion.
Correct Answer: C
C
Explanation:
Option A: Admission Controllers provide security and compliance enforcement, and disabling them would reduce security posture rather than align with image assessment results.
Option B: Applying pod security policies is a general security best practice but is not directly derived from an image assessment.
Option C: Image assessments identify vulnerabilities and provide actionable recommendations, such as updating base images or dependencies to mitigate critical security risks.
Option D: Limiting pods per node is a capacity management measure, not an outcome of image assessments focused on vulnerabilities.
C
Explanation:
Option A: Admission Controllers provide security and compliance enforcement, and disabling them would reduce security posture rather than align with image assessment results.
Option B: Applying pod security policies is a general security best practice but is not directly derived from an image assessment.
Option C: Image assessments identify vulnerabilities and provide actionable recommendations, such as updating base images or dependencies to mitigate critical security risks.
Option D: Limiting pods per node is a capacity management measure, not an outcome of image assessments focused on vulnerabilities.
Question #19
What can you use to specify which assets to check against IOMs and Image assessment policies while leveraging the Falcon Kubernetes Admission Controller?
- A . Pod or Service labels only
- B . Namespaces only
- C . Namespaces and Pod or Service labels
Correct Answer: C
C
Explanation:
When using the Falcon Kubernetes Admission Controller, CrowdStrike allows administrators to precisely scope which Kubernetes assets are evaluated against Indicators of Misconfiguration (IOMs) and Image Assessment policies by using both namespaces and pod or service labels.
Namespaces provide a logical boundary within Kubernetes clusters, often representing environments such as dev, staging, or production. Labels add further granularity by identifying workloads based on application, team ownership, or deployment tier. By combining namespaces and labels, security teams can enforce policies with fine-grained control while minimizing unintended enforcement.
Using only namespaces or only labels limits flexibility and may lead to over- or under-enforcement. CrowdStrike documentation supports the combined approach as a best practice for scalable and precise policy enforcement in Kubernetes environments.
Therefore, the correct answer is Namespaces and Pod or Service labels.
C
Explanation:
When using the Falcon Kubernetes Admission Controller, CrowdStrike allows administrators to precisely scope which Kubernetes assets are evaluated against Indicators of Misconfiguration (IOMs) and Image Assessment policies by using both namespaces and pod or service labels.
Namespaces provide a logical boundary within Kubernetes clusters, often representing environments such as dev, staging, or production. Labels add further granularity by identifying workloads based on application, team ownership, or deployment tier. By combining namespaces and labels, security teams can enforce policies with fine-grained control while minimizing unintended enforcement.
Using only namespaces or only labels limits flexibility and may lead to over- or under-enforcement. CrowdStrike documentation supports the combined approach as a best practice for scalable and precise policy enforcement in Kubernetes environments.
Therefore, the correct answer is Namespaces and Pod or Service labels.
Question #20
You want to customize the GKE autopilot policy by updating the detection severity (Critical) and the detection type (CIS benchmark deviation) along with Vulnerability ExPRT.ai severities (Critical).
Which combination will trigger the prevention?
- A . Vulnerability ExPRT.ai severities (Critical), Detection severity (Critical)
- B . Vulnerability ExPRT.ai severities (Critical), Detection severity (Critical), Image misconfigurations
- C . Vulnerability ExPRT.ai severities (Critical), Detection severity (Critical), Detection type (CIS benchmark deviation)
Correct Answer: C
C
Explanation:
In Falcon Cloud Security, prevention actions are triggered when all configured enforcement criteria within a policy are met. When customizing the GKE Autopilot policy, enforcement requires alignment across vulnerability intelligence, detection severity, and compliance context.
By setting:
Vulnerability ExPRT.ai severity = Critical
Detection severity = Critical
Detection type = CIS benchmark deviation
you ensure that both risk-based vulnerability intelligence and compliance deviation severity thresholds are satisfied. This combination confirms that the issue is not only severe but also represents a critical deviation from an accepted security benchmark, justifying prevention.
Omitting the detection type or replacing it with image misconfiguration alone does not meet the enforcement logic required for policy-triggered prevention.
Therefore, Option C is the correct combination that triggers prevention.
C
Explanation:
In Falcon Cloud Security, prevention actions are triggered when all configured enforcement criteria within a policy are met. When customizing the GKE Autopilot policy, enforcement requires alignment across vulnerability intelligence, detection severity, and compliance context.
By setting:
Vulnerability ExPRT.ai severity = Critical
Detection severity = Critical
Detection type = CIS benchmark deviation
you ensure that both risk-based vulnerability intelligence and compliance deviation severity thresholds are satisfied. This combination confirms that the issue is not only severe but also represents a critical deviation from an accepted security benchmark, justifying prevention.
Omitting the detection type or replacing it with image misconfiguration alone does not meet the enforcement logic required for policy-triggered prevention.
Therefore, Option C is the correct combination that triggers prevention.