Practice Free 2V0-13.25 Exam Online Questions
Which statement would the architect document as a design decision within the logical design?
- A . Service Levels will align with the defined Business Impact Analysis findings.
- B . The solution must provide the ability to patch an existing template.
- C . The VMware Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS) latency sensitivity value will be set to high for the workload cluster.
- D . vSphere High Availability (HA) will be enabled.
C
Explanation:
Logical design decisions specify how features are configured to meet conceptual requirements. In VMware Cloud Foundation logical design, tuning VMware Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS)
parameters such as latency sensitivity for workload clusters is explicitly part of logical design because it directly impacts workload performance and cluster behavior. Options A and B are conceptual or operational, and option D is a standard best practice at the physical design layer. VMware documents emphasize that logical design choices define how features (like DRS, HA, and vSAN policies) are implemented.
Reference: VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Design Guide C Logical Design Elements.
During the design workshop, the customer stated the following requirement:
• The solution must comply with the organization’s security standards.
Which two design decisions should be included in the logical design for the workload domain? (Choose two.)
- A . Use large-size NSX Edge virtual appliances to account for the additional firewall rules.
- B . Enable VM Monitoring for each workload within the cluster.
- C . Enable Inter-SR iBGP routing.
- D . Use an SHA-2 algorithm or higher when signing certificates.
- E . Establish an operations practice to capture and update the thumbprint of the NSX Local Manager certificate on the NSX Global Manager every time the certificate is updated.
D, E
Explanation:
SHA-2 or higher certificate signing ensures cryptographic compliance with modern security standards.
Maintaining updated certificate thumbprints is a crucial operational security task to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks between NSX managers.
These measures directly align with security hardening guidance outlined in the VCF design practices.
Reference: VCF 9.0 Security Design Guide C Certificate Management and NSX Security Practices
The architect documented a requirement for 99.95% high availability to meet the customer’s resiliency needs.
Which two physical design decisions will help meet this requirement in the management domain? (Choose two.)
- A . Configure vCenter HA for the management domain vCenter server.
- B . ESX Host Uplink Setting: EtherChannel = Enable
- C . Advanced Cluster Setting: das.iostatsinterval = 0
- D . Set the restart priority policy for the vCenter Server appliance to high.
- E . ESX Host Uplink Setting: EtherChannel = Disable
A, D
Explanation:
To achieve 99.95% availability in the management domain, the architecture must protect critical management components (like vCenter) and ensure rapid recovery:
An architect is designing a Business Continuity Disaster Recovery (BCDR) strategy for a Virtual Cloud Foundation (VCF) environment with a management domain and multiple workload domains deployed in two datacenters located in the same city.
During one of the initial workshops with stakeholders, the following information was identified:
The Recovery Time Objective (RTO) for workloads is 24 hours.
The management domain must remain continuously available with Recovery Point Objective (RPO) of 0.
Hardware overhead should be minimized by utilizing standby resources that host test workloads during normal operation.
Operational overhead should be minimized.
Latency between both datacenters is 2 ms.
Which design decision should the architect document to satisfy provided requirements?
- A . Use VCF Automation to redeploy the entire environment in case of a failure.
- B . Implement vSAN stretched cluster for the management domain and Live Recovery for the workload domains.
- C . Back up all workloads daily and store them in a central repository to meet RTO expectations.
- D . Use asynchronous replication for both management and workload domains.
B
Explanation:
To ensure zero RPO and high availability for the management domain, the best-fit design is to use a vSAN Stretched Cluster. With a 2ms latency and shared witness site, this design enables synchronous replication and automatic failover, ensuring no data loss (RPO 0) and minimal downtime.
For the workload domains where 24-hour RTO is acceptable, Live Recovery (leveraging replication and automation like Site Recovery Manager or Aria Automation Orchestrator) can be used to minimize operational effort and still meet recovery timelines. This strategy also aligns with minimizing hardware overhead by using the standby test infrastructure as failover capacity.
Reference: VMware Cloud Foundation Multisite Design Guide C Stretched Clusters and Disaster Recovery
VMware vSAN Stretched Cluster Architecture Design
A customer has a new initiative to build a private cloud based on VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF). The customer technical team is presenting an overview of the current state of the infrastructure as well as describing what the expectations are for the private cloud.
Based on the notes captured by the architect, which statement should be documented as a constraint?
- A . The existing storage is out of hardware vendor maintenance.
- B . No funding exists for a new storage array. Therefore, existing storage hardware must be used.
- C . The design must address security zone requirements for management, production, dev/test, and QA workloads.
- D . The design must provide a centralized management console to manage both data centers.
B
Explanation:
Constraints are design limitations that cannot be changed and must be worked around.
B (no funding for new storage, so existing must be used) is a clear constraint, as it restricts the architect from proposing new storage hardware.
A (out of maintenance) represents a risk (unsupported hardware may fail).
C and D are requirements, not constraints, because they describe desired functionality of the solution.
Thus, the correct constraint is that existing storage must be used due to funding limitations.
Reference: VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 C Conceptual Design, RACR Framework: Constraints Section.
When designing a backup and recovery solution for VKS clusters, which tool can be leveraged to back up and restore workloads?
- A . Site Recovery Manager
- B . Velero
- C . Restic
- D . VMware Live Recovery
B
Explanation:
According to the VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.4 Architecture and Design Guide, the officially supported solution for backing up and restoring workloads running on VMware Kubernetes Service (VKS) clusters is Velero, specifically the Velero Plugin for vSphere.
The documentation explicitly states:
“You can backup and restore workloads running on VKS clusters by using Velero. The Velero Plugin for vSphere provides a solution for backing up and restoring workloads running on vSphere Pods and VKS clusters.”
Velero integrates with vSphere through a plugin that manages persistent volume snapshots and metadata backups to an S3-compatible object store. This provides data protection for both stateless and stateful Kubernetes workloads.
While Restic is mentioned in conjunction with Velero for additional support in some environments, it cannot operate standalone in VKS environments. Site Recovery Manager and VMware Live Recovery are used for virtual machineCbased disaster recovery, not containerized workloads. Therefore, Velero is the correct and VMware-supported tool for VKS workload backup and recovery.
Reference (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):
VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.4 ― “Backing Up and Restoring VKS Clusters and Workloads” (pp. 5879C5887)
VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.4 ― “Install and Configure the Velero Plugin for vSphere on a Supervisor” (pp. 5880C5885)
The architect documented a requirement for 99.95% high availability to meet the customer’s resiliency needs.
Which two physical design decisions will help meet this requirement in the management domain? (Choose two.)
- A . Management Port Group: Route based on physical NIC load
- B . Host Overlay DHCP Scope Lease: 14 Days
- C . Physical Switch MTU: 9000
- D . vSAN Cache Tier Sizing: 800GB
- E . Host isolation response: Power Off and restart VM
C, D
Explanation:
Physical Switch MTU set to 9000 ensures optimal performance and reduced packet fragmentation for vSAN and NSX-T overlay networks―critical in HA scenarios.
vSAN Cache Tier Sizing at 800GB provides the necessary performance buffer to support high I/O operations and ensures continued service availability under failure or maintenance events.
Other options like DHCP lease time or NIC load-based routing do not directly influence availability SLA adherence.
Reference: VCF 9.0 Design Guide C Management Domain High Availability Requirements
An architect is responsible for designing a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based Private Cloud solution.
During the requirements gathering workshop with key customer stakeholders, the following information was captured:
• In the event of a disaster affecting the primary site, all tier 1 production services must be restored to the secondary site within 1 hour.
• In the event of a disaster affecting the primary site, all tier 3 production services must be restored to the secondary site within 8 hours.
- A . Recoverability
- B . Availability
- C . Performance
- D . Manageability
A
Explanation:
These are classic Recoverability metrics. The Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) directly relate to how fast and how much data can be recovered after a failure or disaster event. The architect must ensure the VCF deployment includes recovery mechanisms, such as stretched clusters or backup/replication technology, that meet these defined RTO/RPO targets.
Reference: VCF BCDR Best Practices C Recovery Planning Section
Which type of design would include specific details about server hardware, port connections, or Fibre Channel zones?
- A . Logical
- B . Service
- C . Physical
- D . Conceptual
C
Explanation:
The VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Architecture Guide defines three levels of design abstraction ― Conceptual, Logical, and Physical. The Physical Design translates logical components into tangible configuration and implementation details.
VMware describes it as:
“The physical design includes the specific details for hardware models, network topologies, storage layouts, port configurations, VLAN IDs, and zoning of Fibre Channel fabrics.”
In contrast:
The Conceptual Design defines what the solution must deliver (high-level goals and relationships).
The Logical Design outlines component relationships and service flows without vendor-specific or
configuration details.
Therefore, the Physical Design is where the architect defines server model types, port mappings, uplink configurations, vSAN disk group layouts, and Fibre Channel zones, all aligned to the validated VCF Bill of Materials (BOM).
Reference (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):
VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide ― Conceptual, Logical, and Physical Design Definitions (pp. 79C81).
VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.2 Architecture Overview ― Physical Design Implementation Detailing Hardware and Network Configuration.
An architect is responsible for designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based private cloud.
During the design requirements gathering workshop, the following information was captured:
• The solution must capture events from all infrastructure components of the VCF fleet.
• The solution must provide a single pane of glass management interface for troubleshooting, alerting, and monitoring using metrics, events, and flows.
• The solution must meet a 99.9% Service Level Agreement for Availability.
Which three design decisions should the architect make to meet the stated requirements? (Choose three.)
- A . Configure VCF Operations for logs to capture events from only VCF Management components.
- B . Configure the integration for VCF Operations and VCF Automation.
- C . Deploy VCF Operations for logs in a Simple model.
- D . Configure the integration for VCF Operations and VCF Operations for logs.
- E . Configure VCF Operations for logs to capture events from all VCF infrastructure components.
- F . Deploy VCF Operations for logs in a High Availability model.
B, D, F
Explanation:
The VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Architecture Overview and Operations Integration Guide state that VCF Operations, combined with VCF Operations for Logs, provides a unified monitoring and observability solution across the entire VCF fleet.
The documentation specifies:
“Integrating VCF Operations with VCF Operations for Logs and VCF Automation provides a single-pane-of-glass for monitoring metrics, events, and flows across all management and workload domains.”
Furthermore, the High Availability deployment model for VCF Operations for Logs is required to meet the 99.9% SLA for continuous availability of monitoring data.
“VCF Operations for Logs can be deployed in High Availability mode to ensure log continuity and fault tolerance.”
Thus, the architect must:
Integrate VCF Operations with both Logs and Automation (B, D) for unified visibility. Deploy Logs in High Availability (F) mode to achieve the 99.9% availability SLA. Reference (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):
VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Operations Design Guide ― “Integrated Operations and Log Monitoring Architecture.”
VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.4 Integration Guide ― “VCF Operations and Logs HA Deployment.”
